Connecting Cowork to Your Tools — Jira, Slack, Confluence, HubSpot — live data instead of CSV exports

Read jira-export-sample.csv and merchant-risk-profiles.csv from my workspace. Cross-reference: for each Jira issue mentioning a merchant, add the merchant's Risk_Level and Alert_Count from the risk profiles. Create an Excel output sorted by Risk_Level descending. Flag HIGH/CRITICAL merchants with open issues.

Read jira-export-sample.csv. Group issues by Status and Priority. Show: total count, blocked issues (with what's blocking them), critical/high priority items needing attention. Format as a scannable briefing.

I have a meeting in 30 minutes. Below are: (1) the agenda, (2) notes from the last meeting on this topic, and (3) any relevant data or context. Create a 1-page pre-meeting briefing with: key context I need to remember, decisions that need to be made in this meeting, suggested positions on each decision with brief reasoning, questions I should ask, and any risks or concerns to raise. Keep it scannable — I'll read this in the lift on the way to the meeting room.

[Paste agenda, previous notes, and context here]

I'm pasting a chat thread where our team discussed a process change. It got messy. Extract the following: (1) What was ultimately decided — the final outcome, not the debate. (2) Who made the final call (or if it was a group consensus). (3) What alternatives were considered and why they were rejected. (4) Any caveats or conditions attached to the decision. (5) Next steps and who's responsible. Format as a clean "Decision Record" document with date, participants, and a clear structure. Save as decision-log.md.

[Paste the chat thread here]

I'm pasting notes from a meeting. Extract three things:

(1) **Decisions made** — what was agreed, stated as facts.
(2) **Action items** — who owns what, with deadlines if mentioned.
(3) **Draft Jira tickets** — for each action item, draft a ticket with: Title (imperative verb + what), Description (context from the meeting + acceptance criteria), Priority (suggest based on urgency language used), and Assignee (from the action item owner).

Format decisions and action items as a summary at the top. List draft tickets below, ready to copy-paste into your issue tracker.

[Paste your meeting notes here]

I have merchants with incomplete CDD/KYC documentation. For each merchant below, I'll list: name, what documents are missing, and how many days overdue.

For each merchant, draft a follow-up email that: (1) addresses them by name, (2) explains which documents are still needed in plain language (not compliance jargon), (3) states the consequence of not submitting (e.g., settlements remain on hold), (4) provides a clear deadline, (5) keeps a professional but firm tone — this is a compliance requirement, not a request. Save as a Word document, one email per page.

[Paste your merchant list: name, missing docs, days overdue]

I'm pasting a policy document (compliance policy, HR policy, security policy, or similar). It's dense and nobody on my team will read the whole thing.

Create two outputs: (1) A **1-page plain-English summary** — what the policy requires in simple language. No jargon. Written for someone who needs to follow the rules but doesn't need to know the legal reasoning. (2) A **Quick Reference Card** — a bullet-point checklist of the 5-10 things my team actually needs to DO differently because of this policy. Format as: "DO: [action]" and "DON'T: [action]."

Flag anything in the policy that's ambiguous or could be interpreted multiple ways — mark it [ASK COMPLIANCE].

[Paste the policy document here]

I'm evaluating tools/vendors for [purpose]. Here's what I know about each option:

[Paste info about each vendor: name, pricing, features, pros, cons, notes from demos]

Create an Excel workbook with: (1) Sheet 1 — Comparison matrix: rows = criteria (price, features, integrations, support, security, scalability), columns = vendors. Score each 1-5 with a brief justification. (2) Sheet 2 — Pros/cons summary per vendor in plain English. (3) Sheet 3 — Recommendation: rank the vendors with reasoning. Flag any criteria where I don't have enough info to score — mark as [NEED MORE INFO].

Be honest — if two vendors are basically the same, say so.